Raw Food gets slammed by popular website
Hummm not sure what to think of all this or who paid for this article but the whole thing is quite disturbing. See the whole article HERE
The raw foodists claim that eating raw food has long been the "natural" way for us to eat our food. But we have archaeological evidence of humans cooking food some 700,000 years ago.
And finally, about half of the women who follow the raw food diet get so malnourished that they stop having periods. So if a raw food diet makes women infertile, and if raw food was how we used to eat food, then how did the human race multiply so successfully? Surely baby-making should outrank a raw food diet in terms of doing what comes naturally. It seems that with both food and baby-making, some like it hot...

Yes....I saw this as well. I wanted to leave a comment, but then I felt like I was just so grossed out by their misinformation that I didn't bother. Loss of period is not an indication one is infertile. I know a number of raw foodists that don't menstrate, yet they have had successful and healthy pregnancies and babies. Ahhhhhhh!
Posted by: Penni | April 30, 2008 at 09:44 AM