I saw this today and thought it was a great follow up to my post on Bananas.
This is from Roger Haeske blog Supperbeings Secrets. It read as follows:
I met a very nice person a while back named Gina. We've been
corresponding a bit via email as well. She's very excited about raw
foods, but as is usually the case, she has been given lots of false
information on which she's basing her dietary decisions.
In fact, she reminds me of myself about 10 years ago. I thought I
knew a lot about nutrition. But I was filled with a bunch of unsound
and unscientific information from the popular raw food and general diet
books out there.
Of course, it was just such misinformation that made me fail on the
raw food diet over and over again. Without the right information and
support, most people are going to make a ton of mistakes and then
wrongly blame it all on the raw food diet.
Compared to most people, even back then, I was a nutrition expert,
but compared to what I know now, I was like in the third grade of
nutritional school. I remember talking about nutrition and having this
guy who overheard my conversation think I was a diet expert and that
was over 11 years ago before I'd succeeded at staying 100% raw.
If he was fooled by my level of misinformation at that time, imagine
how many people get constantly fooled by scientific sounding arguments
in popular nutrition books.
Just because a doctor says it's right, it should be right. And yet
most of the doctors contradict each other like crazy in these books. So
being a doctor or scientist is not the only criterion to look for when
judging the information you read.
Gina mentioned in a previous email that she would never eat bananas.
I asked her to explain to me why she wouldn't. Below is her brief reply
to me and my detailed explanation to her.
Much of her information is based on a popular diet book called "The
pH Miracle." You have to be really careful with what you read because
it can really lead you down the wrong path.
When you are new and inexperienced to nutrition and diet books it's
very easy to be taken and overly swayed by the scientific sounding
arguments. But many of these books are made up of half-truths and not
based on facts. Or if they are based on facts, they only give you a
small part of the nutritional picture, which doesn't work in real life.
I know what I teach works because I've seen the amazing results in
hundreds of people. It has transformed my life and that of my coaching
clients. Also the Optimal Raw Food Diet makes the most common sense.
I simply use facts and studies to help to convince you that what I'm
saying makes sense. In the end, you'll know simply by trying it and
seeing for yourself. Don't just take my word for it. Do your own
experimentation and research.
This book, "The pH Miracle" isn't even a raw food book. So why would
anyone want to base a raw food diet on this book? This book will make
it very hard for you to stay raw and to do so in a healthy manner
because it will scare you from eating most fruit. But it does so with
incorrect information.
How could this book be so good if this author doesn't understand the
hundreds of thousands of toxins that are created in the cooking
process? Toxins, carcinogens, and mutagens have been proven by science
to be created by the cooking process. Even steaming does horrible
damage to food. Seems to me his knowledge is a bit lacking.
I do believe there is quite a bit of valuable information in this
book, but you have to weed out the inaccurate information from the good
information. This therefore leads to confusion and therefore failure
with the raw food diet.
Someone who doesn't have a deep background in nutritional science
won't be able to detect the truth from the fiction. This is even true
of many of the so-called raw food gurus who support this book.
** Here's Her Email To Me **
Recent Comments